The Hegelian Dialectic is a formula in getting what the person want by firstly creating a problem, an artificial problem that is carefully planned and outlined as to agitate certain response to the victim, this will lead to the second move and that is to present solutions as to trick the victim in believing he has a choice in solving this problem, unknown to him, the choices only lead to the same place, that is on the benefit of the presentor.
Maybe that's why Captain Ajit Vadakayil says that the Hegelian Dialectic preys on the innate nature of humans - that is to trust.
It's easy not to fall victim for this scheme on not trusting anyone and relying on evidence, logic, and mathematical countercheck. But there are cons in counterchecking anything that you encounter because verifying the truth that compels you that it's true takes significant time and chances are you can be wrong on your deductions.
So shall I do with it? Practice Hegelian Dialectic itself and see the loopholes and weak points on this diabolical pet.
I will digress here, I have an instructor, a one mean and tough guy, who really hates cheaters, there was this two students of his that were repeaters and enrolled again on his class, our instructor previously scheduled the first quiz and we had it, on the day of returning the quizzes, when it's time for their papers he just went into commander mode, our instructor asks why does his paper has large written letters when the required space that should be used is minimal. Sir knows that he enlarges his writing for his comrade to read what he had written at the back. So sir reprimanded them badly in the class. The next meeting they were absent.
Okay now I will try Hegelian Dialectic slowly. When will you play it? I will do it on meetings to make men in control so that no woman shall lead men. Okay sounds weird but write your update when you're done.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento